LIVE
Global FX Broker Transparency & Rating
FXCN
API for business Sign in Sign up
FXCN
Global FX Broker Transparency & Rating
Head to head

OANDA vs Forex.com — head-to-head

Compare OANDA and Forex.com using the same evidence standard for regulation, risk, transparency, reputation, disclosure and contracting-entity protection.

What this pair helps you decide

This pair compares only fields supported by FXCN evidence. Check the contracting entity and regional conditions before interpreting score differences.

  • Match US CFTC and NFA registration category and status.
  • Compare the entity that contracts with you, not the brand alone.
  • Compare the protection boundary of each contracting jurisdiction.
Markets requiring a separate entity check: US / UK / AU / international Data as of:

No continuously verified live spreads, commissions, slippage, withdrawal speed, minimum deposit or platform availability are claimed; a blank does not mean the brokers are equal.

OANDA or Forex.com: matching entities in the US, UK and Australia

Both brands have US, UK and Australian entities in FXCN's records, and OANDA also has a Singapore entity. For a US resident, both serve you through an NFA-registered company under US retail forex rules (2% margin on majors, 5% on others). For UK and Australian residents, both fall under roughly 30:1 retail rules. Forex.com's UK and Australian companies trade under the StoneX name.

Licence data from FXCN records (dates in table). Rules checked 11 October 2026. This page recommends neither firm.

1. Which company is likely to serve you FXCN records

If you live inOANDA entity recordedForex.com entity recordedRules
United StatesOANDA Corporation, NFA ID 0325821 (checked 9 Oct 2026)GAIN Capital Group LLC, NFA 0339826 (checked 30 Aug 2026)17 CFR 5.9: 2% / 5% security deposit; check both on NFA BASIC
United KingdomOANDA Europe Limited, FRN 542574StoneX Financial Ltd, FRN 446717; second record (Gain Capital - Forex.Com UK Limited, FRN 190864) unverifiedFCA COBS 22.5; FSCS up to £85,000
AustraliaOANDA Australia Pty Ltd, 412981StoneX Financial Pty Ltd, 345646ASIC order; CSLR excludes FX and derivatives
SingaporeOANDA Asia Pacific Pte Ltd, 200704926KNone recordednot verified here

2. Two US-specific checks

  • NFA BASIC shows registration, NFA membership and disciplinary history; NFA says all registered retail foreign exchange dealers must be NFA members.
  • Salespeople who solicit retail forex orders must be registered as associated persons and approved as forex APs; you can look them up too.

3. Checks before you sign

  1. Confirm the entityin your agreement, noting that Forex.com's UK and Australian entities are StoneX companies.
  2. Search the matching register,or start with the licence check.
  3. Compare costs within the same jurisdiction.

4. Questions

US leverage is 50:1. Is a US account riskier?

The cap sets the largest position you can open; your risk depends on the position you actually take. See leverage.

Why are there two Forex.com UK records?

FXCN holds an active record for StoneX Financial Ltd and an unverified one for Gain Capital - Forex.Com UK Limited. Check the FCA register to see which applies to your account.

Sources and open items

Still to check Singapore retail rules; US negative-balance and compensation arrangements.

WINNER
Brokers A

OANDA

United States · 1996
80.0
Yellow · Caution
Offshore exposure
All onshore
vs
Brokers B

Forex.com

United States · 2001
75.0
Yellow · Caution
Offshore exposure
All onshore

Five-dimension scores

Dimension Weight OANDA Forex.com Δ
Regulation 0.3 100.0 100.0 +0.0
Risk control 0.2 90.0 80.0 +10.0
Transparency 0.2 85.0 70.0 +15.0
Reputation 0.2 50.0 50.0 +0.0
Disclosure 0.1 50.0 50.0 +0.0

What you actually get at each of these two

You contract with one of the licensed entities below, not with the brand. Protection differs enormously between jurisdictions — this section matters an order of magnitude more than spreads.

OANDA
Licenses compared Retail leverage cap Investor compensation Negative balance protection
ASIC T1
Australia · ASIC
Entity: OANDA Australia Pty Ltd
1:30 No statutory investor compensation scheme Mandatory
FCA T1
United Kingdom · FCA
Entity: OANDA Europe Limited
1:30 FSCS, up to £85,000 per person Mandatory
MAS T1
Singapore · MAS
Entity: OANDA Asia Pacific Pte Ltd
1:20 No statutory investor compensation scheme Not recorded
NFA T1
United States · NFA / CFTC
Entity: OANDA Corporation
1:50 No investor compensation scheme; SIPC does not cover retail forex Not recorded
Forex.com
Licenses compared Retail leverage cap Investor compensation Negative balance protection
ASIC T1
Australia · ASIC
Entity: StoneX Financial Pty Ltd
1:30 No statutory investor compensation scheme Mandatory
FCA T1
United Kingdom · FCA
Entity: StoneX Financial Ltd
1:30 FSCS, up to £85,000 per person Mandatory
FCA T1 Unverified
United Kingdom · FCA
Entity: Gain Capital - Forex.Com UK Limited
1:30 FSCS, up to £85,000 per person Mandatory
NFA T1
United States · NFA / CFTC
Entity: GAIN Capital Group LLC
1:50 No investor compensation scheme; SIPC does not cover retail forex Not recorded

Leverage caps, compensation limits and negative balance protection are the jurisdiction’s general rules for retail clients, not a promise by any individual broker; professional clients are treated differently. The licensed entity that onboards you governs in practice.
Source: ASIC Checked 2026-08 Source: FCA Checked 2026-08 Source: MAS Checked 2026-08 Source: NFA Checked 2026-08

Verdict

Under our open-source scoring, OANDA (80.0) ranks above Forex.com (75.0), a gap of 5.0 points. But scores are only a decision aid — what actually drives your risk is which jurisdiction the entity that onboards you sits in. Check the protection table above.

Share

Scan with WeChat

Open WeChat → Discover → Scan