LIVE
Global FX Broker Transparency & Rating
FXCN
API for business Sign in Sign up
FXCN
Global FX Broker Transparency & Rating
Sources auditable

Interactive Brokers

HeadquartersUnited States Founded1978 Regulatory licenses4 Websitewww.interactivebrokers.com

Why this score?

5 dimensions · open algorithm
Regulation w = 0.3
100.0 30.0 pts
Risk control w = 0.2
95.0 19.0 pts
Transparency w = 0.2
100.0 20.0 pts
Reputation w = 0.2 · not assessed (base 50)
50.0 10.0 pts
Disclosure w = 0.1 · not assessed (base 50)
50.0 5.0 pts
Assessment coverage 3/5 · These dimensions lack sufficient public data and stay at the base 50, excluded from downgrade checks: Reputation、Disclosure
Facts marked ↗ link to a public source; the rest are internally verified, evidence link pending Methodology Updated at: 2026-08-30 10:39

Regulatory licenses

4 on record
NFA T1
Active
United States
NFA ID0258600
Interactive Brokers LLC
Verify
Verified 2026-08-30
FCA T1
Active
United Kingdom
Firm reference208159
Interactive Brokers (U.K.) Limited
Verify
Verified 2026-08-30
ASIC T1
Active
Australia
Licence453554
Interactive Brokers Australia Pty Ltd
Verify
Verified 2026-08-30
MAS T1
Active
Singapore
LicenceCMS100917
Interactive Brokers Singapore Pte. Ltd.
Verify
Verified 2026-08-30

Which entity onboards you — and what protection you get

4 entities

You contract with one of the licensed entities below, not with the brand. Protection differs enormously between jurisdictions, so check which entity actually onboards you.

Regulator / Jurisdiction Entity Retail leverage cap Investor compensation Negative balance protection
NFA T1
United States · NFA
Interactive Brokers LLC #0258600
1:50 No investor compensation scheme; SIPC does not cover retail forex Not recorded
FCA T1
United Kingdom · FCA
Interactive Brokers (U.K.) Limited #208159
1:30 FSCS, up to £85,000 per person Mandatory
ASIC T1
Australia · ASIC
Interactive Brokers Australia Pty Ltd #453554
1:30 No statutory investor compensation scheme Mandatory
MAS T1
Singapore · MAS
Interactive Brokers Singapore Pte. Ltd. #CMS100917
1:20 No statutory investor compensation scheme Not recorded
Leverage caps, compensation limits and negative balance protection are general jurisdiction rules, not promises by this broker. Entity names and licence numbers link back to regulator evidence.

Company profile

Structure · Ownership · Listing
Compensation scheme
SIPC
Client funds segregated
Yes — held separately from company funds
Annual reports & investor relations

Score evidence trail

10 scoring facts
Regulation +/− Reason Evidence
Regulation +30.0 Tier 1 licence from FCA (REG_LIC_FCA)
Regulation +30.0 Tier 1 licence from ASIC (REG_LIC_ASIC)
Regulation +30.0 Tier 1 licence from NFA (REG_LIC_NFA)
Regulation +30.0 Tier 1 licence from MAS (REG_LIC_MAS)
Risk control +30.0 Client money is held separately and can be verified (RISK_FUND_SEG) evidence pending
Risk control +15.0 Investor compensation scheme: SIPC (RISK_COMP) evidence pending
Transparency +20.0 Registered and operating locations are consistent (TRANS_HQ_MATCH) evidence pending
Transparency +15.0 Shareholders and directors are publicly traceable (TRANS_SHAREHOLDERS) evidence pending
Transparency +20.0 Audited annual reports are publicly available (TRANS_ANNUAL)
Reputation +0.0 Insufficient user reviews (0) for assessment (REP_INSUFFICIENT) evidence pending

Time Machine

2026-05-15 23:42 ·
2026-05-08 00:42 ·
2026-05-15 23:42 ·
2026-05-08 00:42 ·
2026-05-15 23:42 ·
2026-05-08 00:42 ·

AI editor brief

FXCN risk summary

IBKR is strong on regulatory coverage, market access and cost structure. Users should confirm they understand margin, product permissions, tax forms and cross-market risk.

Generated by AI from structured facts above. All sources are linked under "Why this score".

Frequently Asked Questions

Which authorities regulate Interactive Brokers?

As of 2026-08-30, the FXCN database records 4 active licence(s) for Interactive Brokers: NFA #0258600, FCA #208159, ASIC #453554, MAS #CMS100917, including 4 Tier-1 licence(s). Every entry links to its public evidence source — see the licence table above.

Is Interactive Brokers legit and safe?

Based on public regulatory data and our open-source algorithm, FXCN currently scores Interactive Brokers at 84.0/100 (Yellow · Caution). Scores are fully independent of commercial deals and are not investment advice; fund safety ultimately depends on the licensed entity that onboards your account.

When was Interactive Brokers founded and where is it based?

Interactive Brokers was founded in 1978 and is headquartered in United States.

How can I verify Interactive Brokers's licences myself?

Take the licence number to the regulator's official register (FCA Register, ASIC Connect, NFA BASIC, etc.) and search it. Every licence row on FXCN links to its regulator evidence page with a last-verified date.

How do I spot clone firms impersonating Interactive Brokers?

Clone firms reuse a genuine broker's name and licence number but operate different domains, payment accounts and support channels. Trust only the domain on the regulator's record; "agent onboarding" or "insider channels" are scam signals. Cross-check with FXCN's scam-check tool. Scam Check

Which scoring dimensions has FXCN actually assessed for Interactive Brokers?

The FXCN score combines 5 weighted dimensions: Regulation 30%, Risk control 20%, Transparency 20%, Reputation 20%, Disclosure 10%. As of 2026-08-30, 3/5 dimensions have enough public data to assess; not yet assessed: Reputation, Disclosure. Unassessed dimensions stay at the base score of 50 — they neither add points nor trigger the "any dimension too low" downgrade. We would rather flag a gap than fill it with a guess. Every individual point adjustment is listed in the evidence table above.

How is the FXCN score calculated?

Scores are computed automatically by a 100% open-source algorithm from public regulatory data — anyone can reproduce the exact score locally. Advertising never affects any score; see our methodology and revenue disclosure pages. Methodology

User reviews

No reviews yet.
Evidence-based options

Brokers sharing a regulator appear first, followed by alternatives in the same headquarters jurisdiction and risk band. Every relationship comes from structured FXCN data; nothing is random.

OANDA United States 80.0
Shared regulator: ASIC · FCA · MAS · NFA
IG Group United Kingdom 90.0
Shared regulator: ASIC · FCA · MAS · NFA
CMC Markets United Kingdom 82.0
Shared regulator: ASIC · FCA · MAS
Plus500 Israel 80.0
Shared regulator: ASIC · FCA · MAS
City Index (StoneX) United Kingdom 78.0
Shared regulator: ASIC · FCA · MAS
Forex.com United States 75.0
Shared regulator: ASIC · FCA · NFA
Share

Scan with WeChat

Open WeChat → Discover → Scan