Fidelity is a large US investing and retirement-account platform covering stocks, ETFs, funds, bonds and options. Users should review account type, fund fees, options permissions, SIPC protection and investment suitability.
Identify the onboarding entity from these records before applying the score or any client protection to an account.
| Regulation | +/− | Reason | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regulation | -50.0 | No verified regulatory licence found (REG_NONE) | evidence pending |
| Transparency | +20.0 | Registered and operating locations are consistent (TRANS_HQ_MATCH) | evidence pending |
| Reputation | +0.0 | Insufficient user reviews (0) for assessment (REP_INSUFFICIENT) | evidence pending |
Fidelity is better assessed for long-term investing accounts. Main risks come from allocation, fund fees and options permissions rather than FX leverage.
Generated by AI from structured facts above. All sources are linked under "Why this score".
FXCN has no record of an active regulatory licence for Fidelity Investments. Treat any platform soliciting deposits under this name with extreme caution and verify it with our scam-check tool first.
Fidelity Investments was founded in 1946 and is headquartered in United States.
The FXCN score combines 5 weighted dimensions: Regulation 30%, Risk control 20%, Transparency 20%, Reputation 20%, Disclosure 10%. As of 2026-08-30, 2/5 dimensions have enough public data to assess; not yet assessed: Risk control, Reputation, Disclosure. Unassessed dimensions stay at the base score of 50 — they neither add points nor trigger the "any dimension too low" downgrade. We would rather flag a gap than fill it with a guess. Every individual point adjustment is listed in the evidence table above. Methodology
Brokers sharing a regulator appear first, followed by alternatives in the same headquarters jurisdiction and risk band. Every relationship comes from structured FXCN data; nothing is random.
