LIVE
Global FX Broker Transparency & Rating
FXCN
API for business Sign in Sign up
FXCN
Global FX Broker Transparency & Rating
Sources auditable

Cboe FX Markets

HeadquartersUnited States Founded2006 Regulatory licenses0 Websitewww.cboe.com

Why this score?

5 dimensions · open algorithm
Regulation w = 0.3
0.0 pts
Risk control w = 0.2 · not assessed (base 50)
50.0 10.0 pts
Transparency w = 0.2
85.0 17.0 pts
Reputation w = 0.2 · not assessed (base 50)
50.0 10.0 pts
Disclosure w = 0.1 · not assessed (base 50)
50.0 5.0 pts
Assessment coverage 2/5 · These dimensions lack sufficient public data and stay at the base 50, excluded from downgrade checks: Risk control、Reputation、Disclosure
Facts marked ↗ link to a public source; the rest are internally verified, evidence link pending Methodology Updated at: 2026-08-30 21:02

Regulatory licenses

0 on record
No verified regulatory license on file. This is a high-risk signal.

Company profile

Structure · Ownership · Listing

Score evidence trail

4 scoring facts
Regulation +/− Reason Evidence
Regulation -50.0 No verified regulatory licence found (REG_NONE) evidence pending
Transparency +20.0 Registered and operating locations are consistent (TRANS_HQ_MATCH) evidence pending
Transparency +15.0 Shareholders and directors are publicly traceable (TRANS_SHAREHOLDERS) evidence pending
Reputation +0.0 Insufficient user reviews (0) for assessment (REP_INSUFFICIENT) evidence pending

AI editor brief

FXCN risk summary

Cboe FX should be understood as an institutional venue. Compare its liquidity role rather than rating it like a retail broker.

Generated by AI from structured facts above. All sources are linked under "Why this score".

Frequently Asked Questions

Which authorities regulate Cboe FX Markets?

FXCN has no record of an active regulatory licence for Cboe FX Markets. Treat any platform soliciting deposits under this name with extreme caution and verify it with our scam-check tool first.

When was Cboe FX Markets founded and where is it based?

Cboe FX Markets was founded in 2006 and is headquartered in United States.

How do I spot clone firms impersonating Cboe FX Markets?

Clone firms reuse a genuine broker's name and licence number but operate different domains, payment accounts and support channels. Trust only the domain on the regulator's record; "agent onboarding" or "insider channels" are scam signals. Cross-check with FXCN's scam-check tool. Scam Check

Which scoring dimensions has FXCN actually assessed for Cboe FX Markets?

The FXCN score combines 5 weighted dimensions: Regulation 30%, Risk control 20%, Transparency 20%, Reputation 20%, Disclosure 10%. As of 2026-08-30, 2/5 dimensions have enough public data to assess; not yet assessed: Risk control, Reputation, Disclosure. Unassessed dimensions stay at the base score of 50 — they neither add points nor trigger the "any dimension too low" downgrade. We would rather flag a gap than fill it with a guess. Every individual point adjustment is listed in the evidence table above.

How is the FXCN score calculated?

Scores are computed automatically by a 100% open-source algorithm from public regulatory data — anyone can reproduce the exact score locally. Advertising never affects any score; see our methodology and revenue disclosure pages. Methodology

User reviews

No reviews yet.
Evidence-based options

Brokers sharing a regulator appear first, followed by alternatives in the same headquarters jurisdiction and risk band. Every relationship comes from structured FXCN data; nothing is random.

tastytrade United States 63.0
Same headquarters jurisdiction: United States
Forex.com United States 75.0
Same headquarters jurisdiction: United States
Robinhood Markets United States 75.0
Same headquarters jurisdiction: United States
Charles Schwab United States 75.0
Same headquarters jurisdiction: United States
Webull Financial LLC United States 78.0
Same headquarters jurisdiction: United States
OANDA United States 80.0
Same headquarters jurisdiction: United States
Share

Scan with WeChat

Open WeChat → Discover → Scan