Compare XTB S.A. and Capital Com SV Investments Ltd using the same evidence standard for regulation, risk, transparency, reputation, disclosure and contracting-entity protection.
This pair compares only fields supported by FXCN evidence. Check the contracting entity and regional conditions before interpreting score differences.
No continuously verified live spreads, commissions, slippage, withdrawal speed, minimum deposit or platform availability are claimed; a blank does not mean the brokers are equal.

| Dimension | Weight | XTB S.A. | Capital Com SV Investments Ltd | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regulation | 0.3 | 100.0 | 100.0 | +0.0 |
| Risk control | 0.2 | 90.0 | 100.0 | -10.0 |
| Transparency | 0.2 | 85.0 | 70.0 | +15.0 |
| Reputation | 0.2 | 50.0 | 50.0 | +0.0 |
| Disclosure | 0.1 | 50.0 | 50.0 | +0.0 |
You contract with one of the licensed entities below, not with the brand. Protection differs enormously between jurisdictions — this section matters an order of magnitude more than spreads.
| Licenses compared | Retail leverage cap | Investor compensation | Negative balance protection |
|---|---|---|---|
|
CySEC
T1
Cyprus · CySEC Entity: XTB Limited |
1:30 | ICF, up to €20,000 per person | Mandatory |
|
FCA
T1
United Kingdom · FCA Entity: XTB Limited |
1:30 | FSCS, up to £85,000 per person | Mandatory |
|
KNF
T2
Poland · KNF Entity: XTB S.A. |
1:30 | KDPW compensation scheme (cap approx. €22,000) | Mandatory |
| Licenses compared | Retail leverage cap | Investor compensation | Negative balance protection |
|---|---|---|---|
|
ASIC
T1
Australia · ASIC Entity: Capital Com Australia Pty Ltd |
1:30 | No statutory investor compensation scheme | Mandatory |
|
CySEC
T1
Cyprus · CySEC Entity: Capital Com SV Investments Limited |
1:30 | ICF, up to €20,000 per person | Mandatory |
|
FCA
T1
United Kingdom · FCA Entity: Capital Com (UK) Limited |
1:30 | FSCS, up to £85,000 per person | Mandatory |
|
SCB
T2
Offshore
Bahamas · SCB Entity: Capital Com Online Investments Ltd |
No cap | No investor compensation scheme | Not recorded |
|
FSA-SC
T3
Offshore
Unverified
Seychelles · FSA |
No cap | No investor compensation scheme | Not recorded |
The two differ by 1.0 points, below the 5.0 threshold — under our scoring that gap is not enough to say one is better. Look at the protection table instead: which jurisdiction the entity that onboards you sits in usually decides your real risk more than the total score does.