LIVE
Global FX Broker Transparency & Rating
FXCN
API for business Sign in Sign up
FXCN
Global FX Broker Transparency & Rating
Head to head

XTB S.A. vs Capital Com SV Investments Ltd — head-to-head

Compare XTB S.A. and Capital Com SV Investments Ltd using the same evidence standard for regulation, risk, transparency, reputation, disclosure and contracting-entity protection.

What this pair helps you decide

This pair compares only fields supported by FXCN evidence. Check the contracting entity and regional conditions before interpreting score differences.

  • Separate UK and EU complaint and compensation conditions.
  • Compare verified jurisdiction coverage without treating licence count as quality.
  • Prioritise evidence date, current status and entity match.
Markets requiring a separate entity check: UK / EU / international Data as of:

No continuously verified live spreads, commissions, slippage, withdrawal speed, minimum deposit or platform availability are claimed; a blank does not mean the brokers are equal.

Brokers A

XTB S.A.

Poland · 2002
80.0
Yellow · Caution
Offshore exposure
All onshore
vs
Brokers B

Capital Com SV Investments Ltd

Cyprus · 2016
79.0
Yellow · Caution
Offshore exposure
2 offshore

Five-dimension scores

Dimension Weight XTB S.A. Capital Com SV Investments Ltd Δ
Regulation 0.3 100.0 100.0 +0.0
Risk control 0.2 90.0 100.0 -10.0
Transparency 0.2 85.0 70.0 +15.0
Reputation 0.2 50.0 50.0 +0.0
Disclosure 0.1 50.0 50.0 +0.0

What you actually get at each of these two

You contract with one of the licensed entities below, not with the brand. Protection differs enormously between jurisdictions — this section matters an order of magnitude more than spreads.

XTB S.A.
Licenses compared Retail leverage cap Investor compensation Negative balance protection
CySEC T1
Cyprus · CySEC
Entity: XTB Limited
1:30 ICF, up to €20,000 per person Mandatory
FCA T1
United Kingdom · FCA
Entity: XTB Limited
1:30 FSCS, up to £85,000 per person Mandatory
KNF T2
Poland · KNF
Entity: XTB S.A.
1:30 KDPW compensation scheme (cap approx. €22,000) Mandatory
Capital Com SV Investments Ltd
Licenses compared Retail leverage cap Investor compensation Negative balance protection
ASIC T1
Australia · ASIC
Entity: Capital Com Australia Pty Ltd
1:30 No statutory investor compensation scheme Mandatory
CySEC T1
Cyprus · CySEC
Entity: Capital Com SV Investments Limited
1:30 ICF, up to €20,000 per person Mandatory
FCA T1
United Kingdom · FCA
Entity: Capital Com (UK) Limited
1:30 FSCS, up to £85,000 per person Mandatory
SCB T2 Offshore
Bahamas · SCB
Entity: Capital Com Online Investments Ltd
No cap No investor compensation scheme Not recorded
FSA-SC T3 Offshore Unverified
Seychelles · FSA
No cap No investor compensation scheme Not recorded

Leverage caps, compensation limits and negative balance protection are the jurisdiction’s general rules for retail clients, not a promise by any individual broker; professional clients are treated differently. The licensed entity that onboards you governs in practice.
Source: ASIC Checked 2026-08 Source: CySEC Checked 2026-08 Source: FCA Checked 2026-08 Source: FSA-SC Checked 2026-08 Source: KNF Checked 2026-08 Source: SCB Checked 2026-08

Too close to call

The two differ by 1.0 points, below the 5.0 threshold — under our scoring that gap is not enough to say one is better. Look at the protection table instead: which jurisdiction the entity that onboards you sits in usually decides your real risk more than the total score does.

Share

Scan with WeChat

Open WeChat → Discover → Scan