Compare Plus500 and eToro using the same evidence standard for regulation, risk, transparency, reputation, disclosure and contracting-entity protection.
This pair compares only fields supported by FXCN evidence. Check the contracting entity and regional conditions before interpreting score differences.
No continuously verified live spreads, commissions, slippage, withdrawal speed, minimum deposit or platform availability are claimed; a blank does not mean the brokers are equal.
| Dimension | Weight | Plus500 | eToro | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regulation | 0.3 | 100.0 | 100.0 | +0.0 |
| Risk control | 0.2 | 90.0 | 90.0 | +0.0 |
| Transparency | 0.2 | 85.0 | 70.0 | +15.0 |
| Reputation | 0.2 | 50.0 | 50.0 | +0.0 |
| Disclosure | 0.1 | 50.0 | 50.0 | +0.0 |
You contract with one of the licensed entities below, not with the brand. Protection differs enormously between jurisdictions — this section matters an order of magnitude more than spreads.
| Licenses compared | Retail leverage cap | Investor compensation | Negative balance protection |
|---|---|---|---|
|
ASIC
T1
Australia · ASIC Entity: Plus500AU Pty Ltd |
1:30 | No statutory investor compensation scheme | Mandatory |
|
CySEC
T1
Cyprus · CySEC Entity: Plus500CY Ltd |
1:30 | ICF, up to €20,000 per person | Mandatory |
|
FCA
T1
United Kingdom · FCA Entity: Plus500UK Ltd |
1:30 | FSCS, up to £85,000 per person | Mandatory |
|
MAS
T1
Singapore · MAS Entity: Plus500SG Pte Ltd |
1:20 | No statutory investor compensation scheme | Not recorded |
| Licenses compared | Retail leverage cap | Investor compensation | Negative balance protection |
|---|---|---|---|
|
ASIC
T1
Australia · ASIC Entity: eToro AUS Capital Limited |
1:30 | No statutory investor compensation scheme | Mandatory |
|
CySEC
T1
Cyprus · CySEC Entity: eToro (Europe) Ltd |
1:30 | ICF, up to €20,000 per person | Mandatory |
|
FCA
T1
United Kingdom · FCA Entity: eToro (UK) Ltd |
1:30 | FSCS, up to £85,000 per person | Mandatory |
The two differ by 3.0 points, below the 5.0 threshold — under our scoring that gap is not enough to say one is better. Look at the protection table instead: which jurisdiction the entity that onboards you sits in usually decides your real risk more than the total score does.