LIVE
Global FX Broker Transparency & Rating
FXCN
API for business Sign in Sign up
FXCN
Global FX Broker Transparency & Rating
Head to head

Exness vs XM — head-to-head

Compare Exness and XM using the same evidence standard for regulation, risk, transparency, reputation, disclosure and contracting-entity protection.

What this pair helps you decide

This pair compares only fields supported by FXCN evidence. Check the contracting entity and regional conditions before interpreting score differences.

  • Confirm whether a licensed entity actually serves retail clients.
  • Compare the entity that contracts with you, not the brand alone.
  • Separate onshore protection from offshore-entity exposure.
Markets requiring a separate entity check: EU / UK / international Data as of:

No continuously verified live spreads, commissions, slippage, withdrawal speed, minimum deposit or platform availability are claimed; a blank does not mean the brokers are equal.

Brokers A

Exness

Cyprus · 2008
82.0
Yellow · Caution
Offshore exposure
All onshore
vs
Brokers B

XM

Cyprus · 2009
79.0
Yellow · Caution
Offshore exposure
All onshore

Five-dimension scores

Dimension Weight Exness XM Δ
Regulation 0.3 100.0 100.0 +0.0
Risk control 0.2 100.0 100.0 +0.0
Transparency 0.2 85.0 70.0 +15.0
Reputation 0.2 50.0 50.0 +0.0
Disclosure 0.1 50.0 50.0 +0.0

What you actually get at each of these two

You contract with one of the licensed entities below, not with the brand. Protection differs enormously between jurisdictions — this section matters an order of magnitude more than spreads.

Exness
Licenses compared Retail leverage cap Investor compensation Negative balance protection
CySEC T1
Cyprus · CySEC
Entity: Exness (Cy) Ltd
1:30 ICF, up to €20,000 per person Mandatory
FCA T1
United Kingdom · FCA
Entity: Exness (UK) Ltd
1:30 FSCS, up to £85,000 per person Mandatory
FSCA T2
South Africa · FSCA
Entity: Exness ZA (PTY) Ltd
No cap No statutory investor compensation scheme Not recorded
XM
Licenses compared Retail leverage cap Investor compensation Negative balance protection
ASIC T1
Australia · ASIC
Entity: Trading Point of Financial Instruments Pty Ltd
1:30 No statutory investor compensation scheme Mandatory
CySEC T1
Cyprus · CySEC
Entity: Trading Point of Financial Instruments Ltd
1:30 ICF, up to €20,000 per person Mandatory
DFSA T2 Unverified
Dubai · DFSA
No cap No statutory investor compensation scheme Not recorded

Leverage caps, compensation limits and negative balance protection are the jurisdiction’s general rules for retail clients, not a promise by any individual broker; professional clients are treated differently. The licensed entity that onboards you governs in practice.
Source: ASIC Checked 2026-08 Source: CySEC Checked 2026-08 Source: DFSA Checked 2026-08 Source: FCA Checked 2026-08 Source: FSCA Checked 2026-08

Too close to call

The two differ by 3.0 points, below the 5.0 threshold — under our scoring that gap is not enough to say one is better. Look at the protection table instead: which jurisdiction the entity that onboards you sits in usually decides your real risk more than the total score does.

Share

Scan with WeChat

Open WeChat → Discover → Scan