BingX FX mainly refers to FX, copy-trading or derivatives features inside a crypto trading platform. Users should distinguish spot, contracts, copy trading and FX CFDs, then verify regulation, liquidation rules, custody and copy-trading risk.
Identify the onboarding entity from these records before applying the score or any client protection to an account.
| Regulation | +/− | Reason | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regulation | -50.0 | No verified regulatory licence found (REG_NONE) | evidence pending |
| Transparency | +20.0 | Registered and operating locations are consistent (TRANS_HQ_MATCH) | evidence pending |
| Reputation | +0.0 | Insufficient user reviews (0) for assessment (REP_INSUFFICIENT) | evidence pending |
BingX FX key issue is not traditional FX licensing alone, but crypto-platform risk, copy-trading transparency and contract liquidation. Copy-trading performance pages do not replace risk checks.
Generated by AI from structured facts above. All sources are linked under "Why this score".
FXCN has no record of an active regulatory licence for BingX. Treat any platform soliciting deposits under this name with extreme caution and verify it with our scam-check tool first.
BingX was founded in 2018 and is headquartered in Singapore.
The FXCN score combines 5 weighted dimensions: Regulation 30%, Risk control 20%, Transparency 20%, Reputation 20%, Disclosure 10%. As of 2026-08-30, 2/5 dimensions have enough public data to assess; not yet assessed: Risk control, Reputation, Disclosure. Unassessed dimensions stay at the base score of 50 — they neither add points nor trigger the "any dimension too low" downgrade. We would rather flag a gap than fill it with a guess. Every individual point adjustment is listed in the evidence table above. Methodology
Brokers sharing a regulator appear first, followed by alternatives in the same headquarters jurisdiction and risk band. Every relationship comes from structured FXCN data; nothing is random.
